სხვადასხვა პერიოდში შემოსული ზოგი სპარსული ნასესხობისათვის ქართულში

ანოტაცია

Present paper deals with some loan words, ,that penetrated into Georgian twice on various stages of the history of Persian language, namely Middle and New Persian. Such cyclic borrowing led to the phonetic differences in the parallel forms derived from Middle and New Persian etymons. This phonetic difference also means semantic divergence. At the same time, the above-mentioned parallels are semantically similar from the diachronic point of view. The semantic difference observed on the synchronic plane is due to semantic deviation from the Middle Persian etymon based on hypo-hyperonymy, implication or similation. The research material includes examples of both monosemization and polysemization of the etymon. The meaning of words of New Persian version semantically coincides with the initial forms in Middle Persian. In certain cases the original form is restored by scholars on the basis of Persian loans in Georgian.  The analyzed loan words chiefly reveal lexical stability and derivative activity in Georgian. However, in certain cases there is a tendency of their transfer to vocabulary archive (remaki, xanaga, chauqi, ch'alaki).